A decision handed down last week by the U.S. Supreme Court requiring law enforcement officers to obtain search warrants before taking blood samples from suspected drunk drivers will not affect Warren …
This item is available in full to subscribers.
We have recently launched a new and improved website. To continue reading, you will need to either log into your subscriber account, or purchase a new subscription.
If you are a digital subscriber with an active subscription, or you are a print subscriber who had access to our previous wesbite, then you already have an account here. Just reset your password if you have not yet logged in to your account on this new site.
If you are a current print subscriber and did not have a user account on our previous website, you can set up a free website account by clicking here.
Otherwise, click here to view your options for subscribing.
Please log in to continue |
Original Case In making its ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of Tyler McNeely, who was stopped by the Missouri Highway Patrol in Cape Girardeau County for speeding. According to the Associated Press, McNeely, who had two previous convictions for drunk driving, refused to submit to a breath test. However, McNeely failed several field sobriety tests and the highway patrol stated that the man’s speech was slurred and he was unsteady on his feet. The state trooper, Cpl. Mark Winder, took McNeely to a hospital where a technician took a blood sample, the AP reported. McNeely was handcuffed throughout the process. An analysis of McNeely’s blood sample showed his blood alcohol content was .154 percent, almost twice the legal limit of .08. The Missouri Supreme Court eventually ruled that the blood test violated the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures. The state appealed that ruling and the case went all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court which upheld it.
Electronic Warrants Warren County has implemented an electronic system through which law enforcement officers may apply for search warrants using the Internet, but Wright said the system is too new to know if it will significantly speed up the process of obtaining a search warrant when needed. “Our hope is that it will (speed up the process), but we have not had enough situations to know if it’s more or less efficient,” Wright said. Previously, law enforcement officers had to bring paperwork in person first to Wright and then to a judge in order to obtain search warrants after regular business hours. Prosecutor Mike Wright