The Missouri Public Service Commission approved a stipulation and agreement authorizing Ameren Missouri to establish and implement a large-load customer rate plan for entities such as the proposed data centers for Warrenton and Montgomery County Nov. 24.
This item is available in full to subscribers.
We have recently launched a new and improved website. To continue reading, you will need to either log into your subscriber account, or purchase a new subscription.
If you are a digital subscriber with an active subscription, or you are a print subscriber who had access to our previous wesbite, then you already have an account here. Just reset your password if you have not yet logged in to your account on this new site.
If you are a current print subscriber and did not have a user account on our previous website, you can set up a free website account by clicking here.
Otherwise, click here to view your options for subscribing.
Please log in to continue |
The Missouri Public Service Commission approved a stipulation and agreement authorizing Ameren Missouri to establish and implement a large-load customer rate plan for entities such as the proposed data centers for Warrenton and Montgomery County Nov. 24.
The approval will be effective Dec. 4 and effectively concludes the rate case before the PSC that was filed by Ameren on May 14, pursuant to Senate Bill 4, which required a plan be submitted by Ameren.
Under the terms of the agreement Ameren is authorized to implement a large-load rate plan with the following provisions:
The PSC’s approval comes following a months-long process that involved filings from a number of different entities including Amazon Data Services, Google LLC, Evergy, Liberty, Missouri Industrial Energy Consumers, Sierra Club and Renew Missouri Advocates. The Missouri Office of Public Counsel also was a party to the case.
According to the PSC’s Nov. 24 order, the commission had originally set an evidentiary hearing on Ameren’s application, but the start of that hearing was delayed by requests for further settlement negotiations. Four different nonunanimous agreements were filed, with the final agreement having been filed on Nov. 20.
The public counsel was not a signatory to that agreement. The public counsel’s position is that while it did not join the agreement, it also didn’t oppose it, according to documents. In the notes of the PSC’s order it was noted that the parties did not see eye-to-eye on the agreement. The public counsel had previously filed certain concerns with Ameren’s proposal. Specifically, Public Counsel Chief Economist Geoff Marke objected to the mandatory time-frame for large-load customer agreements, suggesting they should be at least 20 years in length. He also questioned the minimum payment percentage Ameren was seeking from such customers, again suggesting that the percentage should be higher.